Dice Dungeons d100 Metal Dice Sets

How to Read a d100 Dice Roll. Are you doing it wrong?

Welcome to GMs Corner. A new curated collection of opinion pieces from our local GMs.

Hello!

Welcome to the first installment of the GM’s Corner here at Dice Dungeons. This will be a section where we discuss GM things; from how to get over your anxiety as a first time GM to tips and tricks even pros can use.

This time, I have been specifically asked to talk about a subject that I am very passionate about, and have only seen discussed in one buried thread in some orphaned forum somewhere:

You are rolling your d100 rolls wrong.

Now, it’s probably not your fault; these things get passed on from GM to player, and then from player to other players… like some sort of transferable disease. Don’t understand what you’re doing wrong? Let me show you.

Ok, First off, I’m talking about rolling a percentile die along with a d10. If you’re rolling an actual d100, well, this discussion isn’t for you. Let’s look at our dice, shall we?

The d10 is a pretty common damage die used in various RPGs, ranging from a d20 system like Dungeons & Dragons to 2d6 systems like those using the Powered by the Apocalypse engine. Let’s go over what each side means when rolling it in this context, shall we?

Group of metal d10s

Now, let’s take a look at the percentile die. This has a very similar numbering scheme to the d10, with one very important distinction: there is an additional 0 after each number. These are used to denote the zeroes, tens, and nineties place.

metal percentile dice from dice dungeons

Now, you might be saying, “Uh, yea. Obviously. This is a dumb article written by a dumb-o”. Well, let’s just reserve that judgement until after this next bit, ok?

So, in order to get a d100 roll without using an enormous golf ball of a die, we roll a percentile die and a d10 and add the result, right?

For instance, this is 37.

37 on a d100 Dice Roll

And this is 82.

82 on a d100 Dice Roll

And this is 69. Nice.

69 on a d100 Dice Roll

But what, I ask you, would you call the following roll?

50 or a 60 on a d100 Dice Roll?

Every single person I know would call this roll a 50. You’re treating the 0 on the d10 as an actual 0. OK. So, then I ask of you, what is the following roll?

Is this a 7 on a d100 Dice Roll?

Well, that’s obviously a 7. You have 00 on the percentile, and a 7 on the d10. It can only be a 7. It sure as heck isn’t 107, right? Because that’s outside of the range of the d100 roll, right? Because a d100 roll is from 1-100, right?

Everything I’ve shown you so far is fine.

Or it would be, if it weren’t for one little thing…

You see, you cannot treat both the 0 on a d10 as a zero and the 00 on the percentile die as the ‘zero’s place marker’.

It works for the most part, sure. A 10 would be a 10 and 0 on the percentile and d10. Same works for 20, 30, etc…

But, dear friends, how do you roll a 100 this way?

Most people would say a 00 on the percentile and a 0 on the d10. BUT, given the facts I’ve just carefully laid out, that violates the rules you determine the rest of your rolls by. A 00-0 roll would, technically, be a straight up zero.

Instead of a 1-100 scale, you’ve made yourself a 0-99 scale.

 “Oh God, you’re right! How could we have been so stupid? How can we possibly repair this travesty?!” you cry out. Well, I’m benevolent enough a GM that I wouldn’t destroy your world view if I didn’t have a better one to replace it with. And, honestly, it’s pretty simple:

TREAT THE d10 THE SAME WAY YOU’VE ALWAYS TREATED IT.

This way, everything works out perfectly. You can’t roll a zero; a 00-0 roll would be a 10. A 00-1 would be a 1. 90-0 is the coveted 100 roll. Sure, a 40-0 roll being a 50 isn’t immediately obvious, but this is the only internally consistent method I can see here.

 -----

Maybe you don’t want to change. That’s fine; change is hard. But know, fellow GMs and players, that the method you’re using is invalid. You’re changing the rules for different cases.

In a world where consistency in rules and mechanics is required, why too wouldn’t it be required when rolling the dice?

Back to blog

99 comments

This is incorrect.

So long as every result from 1-100 is possible and each has a 1/100 chance of appearing, one needn’t use your method. 00,0 is 100 to most people and has a 1/100 chance of appearing. O0,1 is 1 and has a 1/100 chance of appearing. 00,9 is 9. 10,0 is 10. 10,9 is 19. 90,0 is 90. 90,9 is 99. 00,0 is 100.

Now you can do it your way too. The way I describe effectively shifts the range downward by one from your way and then says the die needed for your 10 actually derives 100.

Try to think about it this way. You say a scale of 0-99 is created when done the “common” way. Well just assume that people are immediately converting that 0 to 100 and there’s your percentile.

Zz

This wouldn’t be a problem if dice makers marked a d10 accurately with a 10 instead of a 0. No other dice are marked inaccurately so why are d10’s marked with a 0 instead of a 10

Nunya

I Have A Much Simpler Solution: Just Add 1 To Each Roll. Allows You To Get Everything From 1-100, And Also Rolling 99 Is Definitely More Satisfying Than Rolling 90 Or 00, Even If All Of Those Mean 100.

Erate

I Have A Much Simpler Solution: Just Add 1 To Each Roll. Allows You To Get Everything From 1-100, And Also Rolling 99 Is Definitely More Satisfying Than Rolling 90 Or 00, Even If All Of Those Mean 100.

Erate

It doesn’t make any difference. The statistics don’t change. It’s far easier to just use 00 + 0 as 100; 50 + 0 as 50. There is absolutely no reason to complicate things and make 50+0 into 60. It doesn’t change the probabilities at all. So why not just keep the intuitive method?

Science

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.